Add "--repository" flag to common actions (where it makes sense) #652

Merged
witten merged 7 commits from nain/borgmatic:repository-ticket-#564 into master 2023-03-16 20:21:41 +00:00
3 changed files with 81 additions and 1 deletions
Showing only changes of commit cdbe6cdf3a - Show all commits

View File

@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
import logging
import borgmatic.borg.prune
import borgmatic.config.validate
import borgmatic.hooks.command
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
@ -23,6 +24,11 @@ def run_prune(
'''
Run the "prune" action for the given repository.
'''
if prune_arguments.repository and not borgmatic.config.validate.repositories_match(
repository, prune_arguments.repository
):
return
borgmatic.hooks.command.execute_hook(
hooks.get('before_prune'),
hooks.get('umask'),

View File

@ -333,6 +333,10 @@ def make_parsers():
add_help=False,
)
prune_group = prune_parser.add_argument_group('prune arguments')
prune_group.add_argument(
'--repository',
help='Path of specific existing repository to prune (must be already specified in a borgmatic configuration file)',
)
prune_group.add_argument(
'--stats',
dest='stats',

View File

@ -7,7 +7,77 @@ def test_run_prune_calls_hooks():
flexmock(module.logger).answer = lambda message: None
flexmock(module.borgmatic.borg.prune).should_receive('prune_archives')
flexmock(module.borgmatic.hooks.command).should_receive('execute_hook').times(2)
prune_arguments = flexmock(stats=flexmock(), list_archives=flexmock())
prune_arguments = flexmock(repository=None, stats=flexmock(), list_archives=flexmock())
global_arguments = flexmock(monitoring_verbosity=1, dry_run=False)
module.run_prune(
config_filename='test.yaml',
repository='repo',
storage={},
retention={},
hooks={},
hook_context={},
local_borg_version=None,
prune_arguments=prune_arguments,
global_arguments=global_arguments,
dry_run_label='',
local_path=None,
remote_path=None,
)
def test_run_prune_runs_with_no_explicit_repository():
witten marked this conversation as resolved
Review

I might suggest combining this test with the previous one, as (unless I'm missing something) their setups are identical besides should_receive('execute_hook') expectation.

I might suggest combining this test with the previous one, as (unless I'm missing something) their setups are identical besides `should_receive('execute_hook')` expectation.
Review

Done.

Done.
flexmock(module.logger).answer = lambda message: None
flexmock(module.borgmatic.borg.prune).should_receive('prune_archives')
prune_arguments = flexmock(repository=None, stats=flexmock(), list_archives=flexmock())
global_arguments = flexmock(monitoring_verbosity=1, dry_run=False)
module.run_prune(
config_filename='test.yaml',
repository='repo',
storage={},
retention={},
hooks={},
hook_context={},
local_borg_version=None,
prune_arguments=prune_arguments,
global_arguments=global_arguments,
dry_run_label='',
local_path=None,
remote_path=None,
)
def test_run_prune_runs_with_select_repository():
flexmock(module.logger).answer = lambda message: None
flexmock(module.borgmatic.config.validate).should_receive('repositories_match').and_return(True)
flexmock(module.borgmatic.borg.prune).should_receive('prune_archives')
prune_arguments = flexmock(repository=flexmock(), stats=flexmock(), list_archives=flexmock())
global_arguments = flexmock(monitoring_verbosity=1, dry_run=False)
module.run_prune(
config_filename='test.yaml',
repository='repo',
storage={},
retention={},
hooks={},
hook_context={},
local_borg_version=None,
prune_arguments=prune_arguments,
global_arguments=global_arguments,
dry_run_label='',
local_path=None,
remote_path=None,
)
def test_run_prune_bails_if_repository_does_not_match():
flexmock(module.logger).answer = lambda message: None
flexmock(module.borgmatic.config.validate).should_receive('repositories_match').and_return(
False
)
flexmock(module.borgmatic.borg.prune).should_receive('prune_archives').never()
prune_arguments = flexmock(repository=flexmock(), stats=flexmock(), list_archives=flexmock())
global_arguments = flexmock(monitoring_verbosity=1, dry_run=False)
module.run_prune(