I used pipx ensurepath and it put export PATH="$PATH:/root/.local/bin" in my .bashrc
echo $PATH shows /root/.local/bin
sudo -E does not work.
upon googling, it looks like…
After upgrading to bookworm and all my backups failing, I was getting the "module not found" error with borgmatic so I came to reinstall and see it's now via pipx instead of pip.
I tried…
As far as I know, no one is working on this one right now. Pull requests are always welcome. 😄
Understood. I best get learning to code I guess.
Any news on this? I keep creating and removing VMs and all the old VMs that I never intend to use again are lingering in my archives.
Thanks for your help on this!
either I first tried to run an older version or missed it in the command line options docs.
when was check added to borgmatic?
matt@pve:~ $ sudo borgmatic --dry-run -v 2 -c…here is where check.py is
matt@pve:/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/borgmatic/borg $ ls
borg.py feature.py rcreate.py
break_lock.py flags.py rinfo.py
check.py …recopied the two files and tried again. note im using python 3.9 not 3.10 in your example above.
and sorry about weird line wraps. i did this on a phone.
matt@pve:~ $ sudo…command executed and waiting for input presumably:
matt@pve:~ $ sudo borgmatic --dry-run -v 2 -c /etc/borgmatic.d/mybk-root.yaml borg check --repair
Ensuring legacy configuration is…sure send over the modified source files. ill give them a shot.
Is there a way to do it without breaking my current install?
If the only changes are the addition of more debugging logs, then it shouldn't break your install. "Shouldn't" being the…
Is there a way to do it without breaking my current install? I use the pre built binary and copy it to /usr/bin which is pretty easy.
I just tested on my other proxmox install using borgmatic…
Here are the results of the tests:
python command:
user@host:~ $ python3 -c "import sys; print(f'terminal is a TTY: {sys.stderr.isatty()}')"
terminal is a TTY: True
echo…
It just seemed like it was an obvious way to handle retconning my data. There's already all that exclude setup in place, why not extend it to recreate?
Incidentally, you may want to look at the…